Let me point out some lowlights of this bill:
- It contains a 12 percent spending increase over 2009
- It contains a 24.4 percent increase in spending over 2008
- $446 billion in total spending
- 5,224 earmarks worth $3.8 billion
- A whopping 1 hour debate
Here are just a few examples:
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) U of Louisville: $8.56 million- Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) Oyster Rehabilitation: $800K
- Rep. Adam Putnam (R-FL) Conserving Fish/Wildlife: $1 million
- Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO) Soybean Research: $690K
This conduct is exactly what's wrong with Congress. Appropriations that wouldn't withstand the smell test on their own get hidden within a regular appropriations bill that "must" pass in order to fund things like veterans programs.
The hypocritical Representatives and Senators who vote against this bill while ensuring it provides their district's bacon must be held accountable. This sort of behavior is expected out of Democrats, but our Republican lawmakers should know better -- and if not, they need to go.

Hatch and Bennett are doing some padding of their own, over on the Senate side. Of course they'll vote against the bill.....
ReplyDeleteSadly, this sort of behavior is expected out of Republicans as well - despite their claims to know better. (And people wonder why we think the Republican party needs to be cleaned up . . .)
ReplyDelete